tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5769309.post111535661444846705..comments2023-07-08T04:04:25.417-04:00Comments on Misanthropicity: BOYS AND GIRLSUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5769309.post-1115417953641334432005-05-06T18:19:00.000-04:002005-05-06T18:19:00.000-04:00Sorry for the delay in replying. I was just out re...Sorry for the delay in replying. I was just out renting “Spiderman.”<BR/><BR/>And, yes, I accept, Anonymous: Me Steve, you jane.Scape7https://www.blogger.com/profile/18235246448706002163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5769309.post-1115417303996094202005-05-06T18:08:00.000-04:002005-05-06T18:08:00.000-04:00You can be Steve, sure. As long as I don't have t...You can be Steve, sure. As long as I don't have to Sally. I mean, <I>be</I> Sally. Jane's more my type. (You know, flighty yet full of keen insights.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5769309.post-1115413949051661522005-05-06T17:12:00.000-04:002005-05-06T17:12:00.000-04:00Be Jeff. Be Jeff. I don't want to be Jeff.<EM>Be</EM> Jeff. <EM>Be</EM> Jeff. I don't want to <EM>be</EM> Jeff.Scape7https://www.blogger.com/profile/18235246448706002163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5769309.post-1115413900098432652005-05-06T17:11:00.000-04:002005-05-06T17:11:00.000-04:00No slack is needed, because you're right. I'm main...No slack is needed, because you're right. I'm maintaining the recent tradition of being an idiot and letting my readers say all the wise and correct things.<BR/><BR/>Still, can I be Steve? I don't want to Jeff. And I don't qualify as Patrick.Scape7https://www.blogger.com/profile/18235246448706002163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5769309.post-1115413684865566932005-05-06T17:08:00.000-04:002005-05-06T17:08:00.000-04:00Oh, I meant by "meta" that it's a post about Coupl...Oh, I meant by "meta" that it's a post about Coupling that is very, how shall I say, informed by the Coupling paradigm. You are channelling the male Coupling characters in your writing about the show. Which may not be the dictionary definition of "meta", but cut me some slack -- I'm a girl.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5769309.post-1115408835792485652005-05-06T15:47:00.000-04:002005-05-06T15:47:00.000-04:00"Meta" would imply a post about posting, I think, ..."Meta" would imply a post about posting, I think, a blog about blogging, when of course this was about a topic of great importance: nipples. Oh, I mean: how men and women approach an aspect of human sexuality from significantly opposite directions.<BR/><BR/>And it is significant, in that the impact of the nipples was so great as to be considered essentially a substitute for nudity by all of the Scape7https://www.blogger.com/profile/18235246448706002163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5769309.post-1115390557756871742005-05-06T10:42:00.000-04:002005-05-06T10:42:00.000-04:00This post is far too meta for its own good. That ...This post is far too meta for its own good. <BR/><BR/>That being said, I don't think you can consider clothed-but-visible nipples to be in the category of nudity, which implies the absence of clothes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com